Browse by Tags

How I diagnosed en elusive ‘is not a valid Win32 application’ exception
06 December 11 10:06 PM | Johan Hedberg | 4 comment(s)
We were using BizTalk Server 2010 and the MQ Client (MQSC) adapter from Host Integration Server 2010 (HIS 2010). We had been getting an exception on and off on servers without really knowing why it appeared on some servers and not on others. We even opened...
BizTalk Server 2010 Standard DOES support 64-bit
02 October 10 02:10 AM | Johan Hedberg | 4 comment(s)
A while back I posted about BizTalk Server 2009 Standard not supporting 64-bit hosts. It was an odd thing in these times of 64-bit computing. The product group came very close to giving an outright promise to remove the limitation in the 2010 version...
BizTalk Server 2009 Standard and 64-bit processing
23 November 09 11:57 PM | Johan Hedberg | 6 comment(s)
I was kind of suprised when I saw this blog post. Saying that 64-bit processing wasn’t allowed with Standard Edition of BizTalk. Since I was at PDC at the time I asked the people there who were (without me putting words in their mouths) equally suprised...
BizTalk Server 2009 Installation Errors
20 August 09 09:29 PM | Johan Hedberg | 2 comment(s)
I just thought I’d mention these install errors since I’ve gotten them now on several occasion when installing BizTalk Server 2009 Enterprise 64-bit Single Sign On Master Secret Server on Windows Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 (although I doubt the last...
Linklist: BizTalk 64-bit
14 April 08 08:15 PM | Johan Hedberg
I've read a few links lately that has to do with issues or gotchas around BizTalk and 64-bit computing. I decided to publish the list to make it more easily available for myself, and others. BizTalk Server 64-bit Support - Frequently asked questions...

This Blog



    Twitter Updates

      Follow me on twitter


      Feedburner Subscribers

      Locations of visitors to this page


      All material is provided AS IS voiding any thinkable or unthinkable effect it might have for any use whatsoever. There... is that clear enough ;)